Skip to main content

Against Empire

It seems like no one outside of the “American Conservative” is thinking about the US as a declining empire. Contrary to what some thought, Trump has no interest in scaling back the US to a “normal” country. That wasn’t what MAGA meant. Quite the opposite, Trump and his goons think the post war international order isn’t US-centric enough. This is where Trump and the neoconservatives find common ground. 

What’s more interesting to me is the Democratic Party, and the liberal/left in general. The Dems are historically the war party, and they have renewed that patriotic passion in the Trump era. The shameful treatment of Ilhan Omar is a good example. This charge of her being “anti-Semitic” for questioning Israel’s influence in US foreign policy is disingenuous and disgraceful. (People are acting like we didn’t already go through this silly “debate” when Walt and Mearsheimer’s book came out over a decade ago. It’s infuriating. These are also the same people who can’t go a half an hour without calling Trump a foreign agent beholden to Putin, who secretly controls the world through some sort of Slavic curse, but I digress.) Omar is a principled anti-interventionist. That’s what has really pissed off the war party, and pleasantly surprised me. Although groomed to be part of the new look Democratic Party, Rolling Stone cover and all, her brave insistence on criticizing US empire is pushing her into Tulsi Gabbardish persona non grata territory. (The Dem leadership is willing to put up with stuff like “the green new deal” so long as AOC continues to refrain from criticizing US empire in any substantive way.) 

Even a section of the left, sensitive to the aesthetics of outright supporting US empire, has bought into cheering on phony internationalism as a substitute. A few weeks ago, or maybe years ago who knows anymore with these sorts of things, author and long time left activist Barbara Ehrenreich tweeted: “I will be convinced that America is not in decline only when our de-cluttering guru Marie Kondo learns to speak English.” This was attacked as xenophobic, racist, etc. This is unsurprising as Twitter is full of people waiting on seat’s edge for someone to say something stupid so they can own the cleverest tweet during the pile on and maybe gain some fake fame. The interesting thing about the reaction to me though, if I’m allowed to humor myself with a little armchair psychoanalysis, is the underlying support of empire in the denunciations of Ehrenreich. The critics all pretended the tweet was about an immigrant being told to speak English by an old white lady rather than an acknowledgement that US cultural power couldn’t compel an international tv star in America to learn English as was once the case. The Twitter left didn’t see middle America reading subtitles as a decline in US power, but rather a win for their phony internationalism, which of course is still dominated by the US. 

The sun will set on the US empire, as it has on every one before it. Right now those true believers tend to go for Trump’s Pax Americana or liberal interventionism. Those who reject both will be attacked by both. We need to make this the issue, regardless of the attacks. The same way evangelicals, when pressed, will admit almost everything they do politically is to end legal abortion, we should be ending empire. Indeed, we should end the very notion of American exceptionalism. Should the United States be a Republic or an empire? This, dare I say, is the fundamental question of the century. At some point (sooner rather than later) we won’t be able to be both. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  I voted for Joe Biden and hope he wins. I’m also alarmed at the increasingly transparent alliance between the Democratic Party and influential sectors of corporate America, namely media conglomerates and the technology industry. (Their relationship reminds me of the Republican Party and the energy industry.) It’s true there are conservative media outlets that are not friendly to Democrats, but it’s far less certain how objective the “paper of record” and other “serious” media would be to a post-Trump and post-COVID Biden administration that is politically and ascetically their peer. (I would say we are at a point of competing Pravdas, but that would be a slander against the Soviet newspaper’s pre-Stalinist period when it was a battleground of ideas.) Perhaps even more damning is the Democratic Party’s relationship to the technology industry, particularly when companies like Twitter and Facebook have shown they are prepared to unilaterally decide what’s true and what’s false. Not many
I’m somewhat familiar with the story, but haven’t seen the tv series “the plot against America.” Is it any good? I’ll admit I have doubts that will be difficult to overcome. My guess is it’s a well stylized but historically simplified attempt to frame international liberalism, particularly the US dominated post war order, as something deeper than what it has become- a value championed almost exclusively by the cosmopolitan elite and global corporations. I also predict that the entire post WW1 context (three months involvement and almost 120,000 Americans dead, split evenly between fighting and the flu pandemic) is lost to Lindbergh and his anti-Semitism. Is this accurate? “The man in the high castle,” another alternative history book made into a tv series that I actually did watch, missed an opportunity to dig into American militarism by not really explaining why so many high level American military members joined the Nazis. (We were supposed to believe it’s just because the Germans wo

Drones are pretty much the perfect weapon

There is no anti-war movement to speak of. There is, however, a small core of activists that like to think of themselves as the movement. Understandably, they have focused their attention on drones. This will continue to isolate them. Put bluntly, your average American doesn't give a shit about drones. Most people, myself included, aren't terribly interested in the abstract legal justification or condemnation of U.S. drone use. (Domestic law almost always takes a backseat to perceived national security threats and many Americans scoff at the very notion of international law to begin with. How dare the rest of the world tell us what to do!) Morally speaking, Americans continue to support "the troops" when they shoot kids in person so it's highly unlikely they're going to be too bothered when some nameless, faceless Pakistani boy gets blown up via a command center in Nevada. Sure, drone attacks create more "terrorists," but so does smashing down door