Skip to main content

Why not vote for Cornel West?

 In January of 1967, Marxist activist Hal Draper wrote:

The lib-labs would then swoon, crying 'The fascists are coming!' and vote for the Lesser Evil. In these last two decades, the Democrats have learned well that they have the lib-lab vote in their back pocket, and that therefore the forces to be appeased are those forces to the right. The lib-labs were kept happy enough if Hubert Humphrey showed up at a banquet to make his liberal speeches; or, before that, by the Kennedy myth which bemused them even while the first leader on this planet poised his finger over the nuclear-war button and said 'Or else!' With the lib-lab votes in a pocket, politics in this country had to move steadily right-right-right-until even a Lyndon Johnson could look like a Lesser Evil. This is essentially why – even when there really is a Lesser Evil – making the Lesser Evil choice undercuts any possibility of really fighting the Right.

Draper was already speculating on that tumultuous, and seemingly recognizable, election year of 1968. I tend to read the essay every four years, mainly as a reminder that things have only gotten worse. For example, the phrase "lib-lab" means labor liberal. Who are the liberals concerned with labor now? They are the only relevant grouping we could call the left. Today's left are yesterday's liberals. The left used to be the targets of liberal fear mongering ("the fascists are coming"). Now the left ARE the ones pretending to fight fascism. (Even in stubborn old France the left's recent fake victory was orchestrated by the world's most prominent neoliberal.) 

So where the fuck is Cornel West? Actually, the real question is where are the people who claim to want to "systemic change?" They're on TikTok. They send lots of tweets. Right now the Democratic Party is in free fall. (Trump takes a bullet with a fist raised. Biden takes Paxlovid with self-isolation.) Is this not the time to show the Dems that you can do more than whine and talk shit, especially if Trump winning is all but inevitable?

The answer of course is no. We must fight fascism by voting for Humphrey, or Harris, or Kerry, or whoever. The cycle is already set for 2028. Vance versus Newsom, and you must fight the fascist Vance. This is the most important election of your lifetime. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  I voted for Joe Biden and hope he wins. I’m also alarmed at the increasingly transparent alliance between the Democratic Party and influential sectors of corporate America, namely media conglomerates and the technology industry. (Their relationship reminds me of the Republican Party and the energy industry.) It’s true there are conservative media outlets that are not friendly to Democrats, but it’s far less certain how objective the “paper of record” and other “serious” media would be to a post-Trump and post-COVID Biden administration that is politically and ascetically their peer. (I would say we are at a point of competing Pravdas, but that would be a slander against the Soviet newspaper’s pre-Stalinist period when it was a battleground of ideas.) Perhaps even more damning is the Democratic Party’s relationship to the technology industry, particularly when companies like Twitter and Facebook have shown they are prepared to unilaterally decide what’s true and what’s false. Not many
I’m somewhat familiar with the story, but haven’t seen the tv series “the plot against America.” Is it any good? I’ll admit I have doubts that will be difficult to overcome. My guess is it’s a well stylized but historically simplified attempt to frame international liberalism, particularly the US dominated post war order, as something deeper than what it has become- a value championed almost exclusively by the cosmopolitan elite and global corporations. I also predict that the entire post WW1 context (three months involvement and almost 120,000 Americans dead, split evenly between fighting and the flu pandemic) is lost to Lindbergh and his anti-Semitism. Is this accurate? “The man in the high castle,” another alternative history book made into a tv series that I actually did watch, missed an opportunity to dig into American militarism by not really explaining why so many high level American military members joined the Nazis. (We were supposed to believe it’s just because the Germans wo

Leftism is Just Exclamation Point Liberalism

  The February issue of Harper’s Magazine poses the question “Is Liberalism Worth Saving?” on its cover. The panel of four, who more or less cover the mainstream of the ideological spectrum, for the most part give familiar praise and criticism. One panelist, however, gives a forceful and fundamental critique of liberalism. That person is not the representative of the left. To be sure, the left representative makes all the standard criticisms of classical liberalism (imperialism, racism, inequality) but these issues have all been confronted, for decades, within forms of political liberalism like social democracy and even neoliberalism. The real underlying critique of liberalism, the one that challenges its foundational tenets, is coming from the post-liberal right.  This is relatively new.  Because being marginalized and uninfluential are baked into the ethos of the radical left, something I definitely internalized while attempting to organize first as an anarchist and then a Trotskyis