Skip to main content

Spinning Boris

During the 1996 Russian Presidential election the Clinton administration sent advisers to secure electoral victory for Boris Yeltsin. The election was fraudulent, by all credible accounts, as the deeply unpopular Yeltsin had already effectively sold off the country to the highest bidders causing millions of people to lose their pensions and plunging tens of thousands into life threatening poverty. The general chaos of the Yeltsin years provided the framework for Putin’s rise as the one to bring back order. 

This collusion between the Yeltsin and Clinton governments was such a non-issue there was even a goofy Jeff Goldblum movie made about it. (Google “Spinning Boris.”) 

This basic context, and I’ve barely scratched the surface when it comes to the US inserting itself into Russian affairs after the fall of the Soviet Union, is almost never given when the media reports on Russia. This is likely because it makes “Russian agents” exposing the DNC’s bias against Bernie Sanders and placing a relative handful of ridiculous Facebook ads look like child’s play. It’s a much more compelling story when Putin is exaggerated to be an evil genius when really he’s a somewhat competent right wing leader who primarily reacts to things beyond his control. I’m not one to make much of this “Putin hates Hillary Clinton” argument, but it is pretty easy to see, from his perspective, why he would prefer Trump to Clinton given their history. It would be stupid not to. 

I first started really following politics when I was outraged by the Iraq war. Trying to provide some historical context to war mongering conservatives was maddening. I feel that madness again. Trump is a terrible president and an even worse human being. The Republican Party, once the party of Thaddeus Stevens, has reached a new level of disgustingness. Vote them out of office. But do it because they have terrible politics, awful ideas, and worse policies. Don’t rely on xenophobic fear and ridiculous conspiracies. 

Know your history. Trump is not Hitler. And no matter what Vice news says, there are not hordes of nazis waiting to take over cities across the country. (Poor Vice, they’ve been reduced to reporting on nazis taking over paganism. Yes, white nationalists are going to win a mass following through a religion Julian couldn’t impose on people as emperor of Rome nearly 2000 years ago. Lol.) 

Not only do the liberals who want to be the jingoists not convince the conservatives who already are the jingoists, they turn off your average voter. Poll after poll shows most people aren’t having this bizarre meltdown over Putin and Trump, but the chattering class reads how Russian hacking is “our Pearl Harbor” in politico and starts foaming at the mouth. As the meme says, Rachael Maddow has become Alex Jones for people who drove a Prius. Liberalism is in serious trouble. It’s not as much Trump as it is the reaction to Trump. It feels sadder than I would have expected. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hanging from a cliff

The day after Obama won his second term the markets took a bit of a tumble. The Dow dipped below 13,000 for the first time in a few months. US Congressional gridlock and the ongoing crisis in Europe are mostly to blame. What is more interesting, even if it's unsurprising, is the rush to bonds- US government bonds to be exact. Indeed, the yield on ten-year treasury notes dipped as low as it has since May. Even with our ratings downgrade (which no one now cares about in the slightest) and huge debt, it is cheaper than ever for us to borrow money. We are still the safest piggy bank out there. 

With the "fiscal cliff" of expiring tax cuts and automatic spending cuts looming, the spirit of compromise is being sprayed into the air like a bottle of Glade mountain berry. Democrats are fond of saying we need a "balanced" approach to reducing the deficit. Nominally this means some tax increases along with spending cuts. Republicans are now, apparently, open to some sort…

The Earth is not Fragile

I found myself cringing the other day listening to a well intentioned, yet completely ridiculous, city slicking environmentalist tell a room full of us how fragile the earth is. I wanted to scream "it is not!" but decorum got the better of me and I stayed quiet. It isn't fragile, not in any real sense of the word. The earth would just as soon wash us all away in a flood than conjure up a gorgeous sunset.
One of the most punk rock things you can do these days, particularly at dinner parties in liberal enclaves like where I live, is say you're skeptic when it comes to what people view as scientific consensus. Usually people think climate change, and are immediately offended by the idea that someone may disagree with what they've been told is humanity's most desperate and urgent threat. This is not to say I don't believe the earth is getting warmer, I surely do, or that I believe humans haven't had an effect on the environment, we certainly have. It'…

Austerity Ecology and The Collapse-Porn Addicts

I just finished Leigh Phillip’s left defense of humanity, “Austerity Ecology And The Collapse-Porn Addicts.” I think it’s important to frame it that way, as one of the main point he makes (and I fully agree) is that the earth doesn’t need us to survive. What we should focus on is our species. And not just surviving, but prospering, even conquering (I know people don’t like that word, but we ought not be scared of power). Phillips goes through every argument that I grew up with, from green austerity to that overpopulation nonsense, and convincingly does away with them. (I read Derrick Jensen was I was younger and had completely spaced out how truly terrible his arguments are. Embarrassingly bad. When I tried John Bellamy Foster I luckily found him too dense to get through. Just like George Ciccariello-Maher is a caricature of your “edgy” left wing professor, Foster is a caricature of what a Marxist is, tough to understand but you should know what he’s saying is super important!) 

Phill…