Skip to main content

Spinning Boris

During the 1996 Russian Presidential election the Clinton administration sent advisers to secure electoral victory for Boris Yeltsin. The election was fraudulent, by all credible accounts, as the deeply unpopular Yeltsin had already effectively sold off the country to the highest bidders causing millions of people to lose their pensions and plunging tens of thousands into life threatening poverty. The general chaos of the Yeltsin years provided the framework for Putin’s rise as the one to bring back order. 

This collusion between the Yeltsin and Clinton governments was such a non-issue there was even a goofy Jeff Goldblum movie made about it. (Google “Spinning Boris.”) 

This basic context, and I’ve barely scratched the surface when it comes to the US inserting itself into Russian affairs after the fall of the Soviet Union, is almost never given when the media reports on Russia. This is likely because it makes “Russian agents” exposing the DNC’s bias against Bernie Sanders and placing a relative handful of ridiculous Facebook ads look like child’s play. It’s a much more compelling story when Putin is exaggerated to be an evil genius when really he’s a somewhat competent right wing leader who primarily reacts to things beyond his control. I’m not one to make much of this “Putin hates Hillary Clinton” argument, but it is pretty easy to see, from his perspective, why he would prefer Trump to Clinton given their history. It would be stupid not to. 

I first started really following politics when I was outraged by the Iraq war. Trying to provide some historical context to war mongering conservatives was maddening. I feel that madness again. Trump is a terrible president and an even worse human being. The Republican Party, once the party of Thaddeus Stevens, has reached a new level of disgustingness. Vote them out of office. But do it because they have terrible politics, awful ideas, and worse policies. Don’t rely on xenophobic fear and ridiculous conspiracies. 

Know your history. Trump is not Hitler. And no matter what Vice news says, there are not hordes of nazis waiting to take over cities across the country. (Poor Vice, they’ve been reduced to reporting on nazis taking over paganism. Yes, white nationalists are going to win a mass following through a religion Julian couldn’t impose on people as emperor of Rome nearly 2000 years ago. Lol.) 

Not only do the liberals who want to be the jingoists not convince the conservatives who already are the jingoists, they turn off your average voter. Poll after poll shows most people aren’t having this bizarre meltdown over Putin and Trump, but the chattering class reads how Russian hacking is “our Pearl Harbor” in politico and starts foaming at the mouth. As the meme says, Rachael Maddow has become Alex Jones for people who drove a Prius. Liberalism is in serious trouble. It’s not as much Trump as it is the reaction to Trump. It feels sadder than I would have expected. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I’m somewhat familiar with the story, but haven’t seen the tv series “the plot against America.” Is it any good? I’ll admit I have doubts that will be difficult to overcome. My guess is it’s a well stylized but historically simplified attempt to frame international liberalism, particularly the US dominated post war order, as something deeper than what it has become- a value championed almost exclusively by the cosmopolitan elite and global corporations. I also predict that the entire post WW1 context (three months involvement and almost 120,000 Americans dead, split evenly between fighting and the flu pandemic) is lost to Lindbergh and his anti-Semitism. Is this accurate? “The man in the high castle,” another alternative history book made into a tv series that I actually did watch, missed an opportunity to dig into American militarism by not really explaining why so many high level American military members joined the Nazis. (We were supposed to believe it’s just because the Germans wo
4 comments
Read more
  I voted for Joe Biden and hope he wins. I’m also alarmed at the increasingly transparent alliance between the Democratic Party and influential sectors of corporate America, namely media conglomerates and the technology industry. (Their relationship reminds me of the Republican Party and the energy industry.) It’s true there are conservative media outlets that are not friendly to Democrats, but it’s far less certain how objective the “paper of record” and other “serious” media would be to a post-Trump and post-COVID Biden administration that is politically and ascetically their peer. (I would say we are at a point of competing Pravdas, but that would be a slander against the Soviet newspaper’s pre-Stalinist period when it was a battleground of ideas.) Perhaps even more damning is the Democratic Party’s relationship to the technology industry, particularly when companies like Twitter and Facebook have shown they are prepared to unilaterally decide what’s true and what’s false. Not many
2 comments
Read more
State power (that is the ability of the state to use brute force) has increased beyond any somewhat comparable moment in history, yet the state’s ability to everyday govern has decreased to historically poor levels. People (across the political spectrum) typically make sense of this through various conspiracy theories, some more attached to reality than others. (Many are nakedly conspiratorial, others have elements of structural analyses, usually done by trained post-structuralists of course.) America is ground zero, but this is not exclusively an American phenomenon. (China is a possible counter-example, though their competence is both exaggerated and relies heavily on the brute force part of the state.)  This creates a stalemate of sorts. The state lacks legitimacy, but also can’t be replaced. You can add Ross Douthat’s Laschian critique of societal “decadence” (drift may be a better word) to this context. His analysis is largely correct in my view and he’s also right that it’s relat
Post a Comment
Read more