Skip to main content

Economics is largely bullshit

an uninterrupted rant-

My economics teacher would have me believe that the world is made up of small businesses, or perhaps more accurately, big businesses that act like small businesses. This is the theory. Capitalists justify expropriating excess profits because they are the ones who take the risks. In reality, risk is gone. Bankruptcy is profitable. Management walks away with millions while workers lose their savings. We watched a video explaining how outsourcing was actually a good thing because companies were then able to invest their extra profits back into the economy and create better, higher paying jobs. Right, tell that to the millions of people that work in the low-paying service industry after their high-paying manufacturing job went to some country that virtually enslaves their workers. My guess is that money the corporation saved went into the CEO's 5th or 6th new home. China's industrial boom has diverted social spending away from rural areas. It's also caused a massive human migration to the cities that has created a class of urban peasants that have little to no rights. They are expendable. You get sick, you lose your job. You lose your job, you don't eat. You have kids, they'd better know how to raise themselves. Migrants have to set up their own schools because their children are not allowed to go to city schools. This invisible class that fills up Chinese slums is roughly the same size as the population of the entire United States. India, Thomas Friedman's example of a success story, is going through similar times. While people like Friedman laud its "growth," farmers are killing themselves by the tens of thousands. Instead of offering support for rural development, the Indian government's neoliberal reforms are boosting the international private sector and encouraging the millions of peasant farmers to export their crops rather than feed themselves and their country. With little to no reasonable rural credit, they go into deep debt trying to compete with subsidized Western agriculture. Rather then pass on the debt to their family, they off themselves. Oh, and China too. Interestingly enough, one thing that we do actually export to China is cotton. As with Indian farmers, Chinese farmers can't compete with US subsidized cotton so they join the other peasant migrants and head to the slums of Beijing. Ain't "free trade" grand? Economists would have us believe so. And so would my economics teacher. And so would asshole columnists for the NY Times. It's interesting that when Cuba trades doctors for oil with Venezeula (talk about comparative advantage!), both countries are simply discounted by economists. When I questioned my instructor on how much influence the multi-billion dollar advertising industry has on the market, he basically said not much. He said that the ultimate decision is left up to the consumer and based on the consumer's needs. Yeah. 'Cause we needed those fucking zubaz, those fruity pebbles my mom would almost never buy, and that goddamned Hummer H2O!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Austerity Ecology and The Collapse-Porn Addicts

I just finished Leigh Phillip’s left defense of humanity, “Austerity Ecology And The Collapse-Porn Addicts.” I think it’s important to frame it that way, as one of the main point he makes (and I fully agree) is that the earth doesn’t need us to survive. What we should focus on is our species. And not just surviving, but prospering, even conquering (I know people don’t like that word, but we ought not be scared of power). Phillips goes through every argument that I grew up with, from green austerity to that overpopulation nonsense, and convincingly does away with them. (I read Derrick Jensen was I was younger and had completely spaced out how truly terrible his arguments are. Embarrassingly bad. When I tried John Bellamy Foster I luckily found him too dense to get through. Just like George Ciccariello-Maher is a caricature of your “edgy” left wing professor, Foster is a caricature of what a Marxist is, tough to understand but you should know what he’s saying is super important!) 

Phill…

Hollywood Award Shows are Basically Advertisements for Trump

Given the “resistance” has grounded itself in moralism, it’s perfect Oprah Winfrey is the latest hope. She has trash politics, but gave a speech that sounded wonderful but would have only really mattered before #metoo had “startup” potential. Oprah Winfrey is a retired billionaire in charge of a media empire. She surely could have revealed that Weinstein was a predator, an open secret within Hollywood, without losing her livelihood. Instead she was giving him kisses on another one of those fancy Trump ads. Do we still wonder why calling Trump a hypocrite isn’t the devastating political argument many liberals imagine it to be?
I’m listening to Christopher Hitchens’ fine collection of essays, “arguably.” I’d read many of these years ago, but had forgotten how good of a writer he was. Listening to him take down JFK is pure poetry. However his post 9/11 theme, that fundamentalist Islam is the threat most comparable to 20th century fascism for the enlightenment influenced democracies, stands on even shakier ground today. His realpolitik version of Trotsky’s “permanent revolution” had our enlightenment influenced democracy with Puritan characteristics as some sort of revolutionary regime spreading the best we can do to some despotic areas. It’s quite a twist that Iraq ended up being a boon to Iran, which caused the gulf monarchies to freak out. Of course Trump and his goons are now trying to make amends by demonizing Iran to an absurd degree. I wonder if America allying itself with al-Qaeda in Syria would be enough to cause Hitchens to rethink some things? Maybe his weird hatred for the Baathists extended to the…